Lisa Miller had a one page editorial in Newsweek this week about True Love Revolution, a pro-abstinence group at Harvard. The group has recently tempered their language to include not only waiting for marriage to have sex, but also that marriage is defined as "one man, one woman."
Miller writes,
At Harvard, it's sounding a lot like the '70s again. Thanks to the provocations of True Love Revolution, the university's three-year-old pro-abstinence club, brainy women are defending their right to have sex with whomever they want, whenever and however they want.
It seems as if Miller and the people she quotes in her article are horrified and very surprised that these groups exist at Harvard. I wonder what offends them so much. Is it that there are conservatives in Ivy League institutions? Or that women are saying it's okay to not have sex? Are they oh so offended by this conservative rhetoric?
Whatever their reasons or opinions, this is for sure: No one should be surprised these groups exist at schools like Harvard.
Since 1981, the federal government has pushed abstinence only education. And if you think it's only a Republican issue, then think again. Despite a democratic majority in Congress and the fact that the majority of people in America want comprehensive sexual education, year after year, over $170 million is allocated to abstinence only sexual education.
After almost 30 years of abstinence only sexual education, why are people so shocked when groups like this show up in colleges and universities nationwide?
And the better question is why are people so afraid of these groups having a voice at institutions of higher education?



